My acquisition of non-Polaroid instants
has been accidental and secondary. I never really intended to get a
collection of these, but I am glad I have. They provide a strong
counterpoint to Polaroid and help further tell the Polaroid story.
Since Dr. Land invented instant
photography, and held more patents than anyone in the world(
excepting Thomas Edison) all instant photography attempts outside of
Polaroid were on shaky ground legally.
The examples I have of non-Polaroid
cameras are the Berkeys and the Kodaks, with the contemporary
addition of Lomographic Society’s Lomo Instant, Fuji Mini and Fuji
Wide, Fuji Mr. Handy, and holgaroid. Berkey’s cameras were
obviously copies of Polaroid, and when threatened with a lawsuit over
their sx-70 copy , they discontinued production.
While Kodak instant cameras definitely
looked different (they were twice the size and really ugly) they used
stolen technology from Polaroid, and were sued for patent
infringement. To this day, this was the single biggest corporate
lawsuit. Kodak was found guilty, and paid a major settlement. They
also had to stop all production of the cameras and the film, and
initiated a major recall and refund program. I find Kodak’s instant
cameras ugly in a funky way, so I snagged them here and there for a
couple of bucks.
These cameras highlight the unique
challenge instant cameras pose. To this day, I hear photography
equipment reviews lambasting instant cameras for traits that are
impossible to avoid for this medium. Often they will comment on the
size of the camera, faulting the companies for the bulky shape.
Kodak’s cameras were huge because, like Polaroid cameras, they
contained an entire darkroom! Doctor Land’s SX-70, the sleekest and
sexiest SLR ever, was a miracle of design and engineering he had been
working on his entire life. It was the exception , not the rule.
Another challenge was getting a large format focal length out of a camera that takes up as little space as possible. Polaroid used mirrors to achieve this, and Kodak didn’t for most of theirs. This also explains the rather large size.
Another challenge was getting a large format focal length out of a camera that takes up as little space as possible. Polaroid used mirrors to achieve this, and Kodak didn’t for most of theirs. This also explains the rather large size.
Going from camera to print meant that
the hardware had to perform much more consistently than regular film
cameras, as there was no darkroom post processing for over and under
exposure.
My experience with this small
collection taught me something else about Polaroid. Their quality
control was excellent. I have worked on pretty much every Polaroid
camera there is, and it is relatively easy to get them to work again,
even if they are 50 years old or older. The same can not be said
about the Kodaks and Berkeys. About ninety percent of the Kodaks I
have are non- functioning. More than ninety percent of Polaroids I
get are functioning. The Berkey Sx-70s all require attention, though
their packfilm varieties are stout and full featured compared to
Polaroid's plastic packfilm cameras.
Fuji, though
inextricably intertwined with the history of both Polaroid and Kodak
instants, has come into its own in the U.S. since the demise of
Polaroid. Their quality control easily rivaled Polaroid, and their
film can even be said to exceed Polaroid in some categories. This may
seem a bit of a miracle since we only see Fuji instants as a recent
thing, but their history with instant stretches back quite a while.
In the 1980s they made a Fotorama series of cameras that took from
the camera design and film design of the Kodak line. Polaroid agreed
to allow Fuji only to maintain the foreign markets in exchange for
access to Fuji's R&D on magnetic tapes. Later, in the 90s, Fuji
introduced the Cheki and the Mio, which are what we think of as
Instax Mini cameras. The Mio was branded as a Polaroid and included
in their line.
Fuji also made some amazing peel apart
film starting in 1984, with no issues of patent infringement because
by then Polaroid's patents on packfilm had expired.
I have several Fuji Wide and Mini
cameras. Since the market is currently flooded with these, it was not
hard to acquire them cheaply. Though they are fun at parties, they
are significantly more fragile than Polaroids were. My dog's whipping
tail knocked my Wide off a table and it crashed into many pieces from
a 32 inch fall!
None of my non -Polaroid instants are
what I would call professional grade- which is disappointing, because
Fuji Instax film is a great integral film. The closest to a
professional , creative tool is my Lomography Instant which offers
some extra features like add on lenses, bulb, and multiple exposure.
It shoots Instax Mini. New to the instant market, the Lomography
Instant has low build quality. I have hopes for their new instant
offerings.
The Holgaroid is just that- a cheap chinese Holga with a Polaroid back- gotta love it for fun instant shots with the character of a cheap plastic lens camera!
OK, so I am supposed to be collecting
Polaroids! What happened? Instant photography is an addiction, and
apparently Polaroid cameras are a gateway drug. My Polaroid
collection has not only re-invigorated my interest in photography
after a ho-hum relationship with digital, but it is directly
responsible for my new darkroom experiments! I blame my latest
acquisition, a 350 pound copy camera, squarely on my drug of choice.
This Berkey instant packfilm camera featured an electric flash, something Polaroid never got around to adding to their plastic packfilm cameras. |
I have yet to find a Berkey SX_70 that works. |
Mr Handy is a Fuji instant that never made it across the ocean. Love the name! |
The Kodak instants are so ugly they are strangely appealing, Don't ask me to explain this. |
The Coca Cola Happy Times is the only company branded Kodak that I am aware of. Polaroid did tons of company branding. |
Again with the ugly duckling! I love the funky look of this one! |
No comments:
Post a Comment